The arrival of generative AI has unleashed a wave of innovation unlike anything we’ve seen in decades. New models create art, draft code, compose music, suggest business strategies, and even help diagnose complex medical conditions. Every week seems to bring a new “breakthrough” headline.
It’s tempting to believe that with enough data and compute power, every problem has a winning solution now.
But the old truths haven’t been overthrown — they’ve just put on a new suit.
Pareto still lives on.

The Pareto Principle, often called the 80/20 rule, states that 80% of outcomes often come from 20% of the efforts. In tech, it reminds us that not every innovation or solution delivers equal value. Only a few ideas will drive most of the real impact — and generative AI is no exception.

The Mirage of Infinite Success

Generative AI platforms are astonishing. They are fast, accessible, and seemingly limitless. But that doesn’t mean every output they generate is valuable — or even viable.
For every remarkable application, there are dozens of shallow, unfocused, or impractical ones.
It’s easy to get lost in a flood of possible solutions without asking the most important question:
Does this actually solve a meaningful problem?

The democratization of creation has shifted the bottleneck from building things to building the right things.
It’s no longer about whether you can generate an app, a marketing plan, a product idea — it’s whether what you’ve generated makes sense, fits the market, or moves the needle.

Innovation Fatigue: When Good Enough Isn’t Good Enough

In a world where anyone can spin up thousands of ideas in a day, true value comes from discernment.
We’re witnessing the rise of Innovation Fatigue: a phenomenon where organizations feel the pressure to adopt AI-generated solutions without enough critical evaluation.
A team might prototype 10 GenAI-enhanced products… only to realize that maybe 2 of them were even worth pursuing.
The others?
A distraction. An expense. A lesson.

Pareto whispers again: the real gains will come from a small fraction of what’s created. The difference now is that the volume of possibilities is exponentially larger — making discernment even more crucial.

Why Some Solutions Fail (and That’s Okay)

Even with the smartest AI in the room, some solutions simply won’t succeed. Why?
Because:

• They target non-existent problems.
• They create more friction than they remove.
• They aren’t economically sustainable.
• They miss emotional, cultural, or human nuances AI can’t fully grasp yet.
• Timing is wrong — the world just isn’t ready.

And that’s perfectly normal. The nature of creativity, human or AI-augmented, has always been partly experimental. Failure isn’t just a byproduct; it’s a necessary part of finding the 20% that really matters.

Winning in the GenAI Era: Focus, Test, Refine

How can individuals and organizations avoid getting lost in the noise?
By remembering that Pareto lives on — and adapting their strategies accordingly:

• Prioritize ruthlessly: Treat AI-generated ideas like a brainstorming session, not a blueprint.
• Validate quickly: Build tiny experiments before scaling.
• Measure impact over output: Focus on tangible outcomes, not just flashy prototypes.
• Stay human-centered: Remember that value is ultimately judged by real people, not algorithms.

The best solutions — even today — will come from the small percentage of ideas that combine technical possibility with real human need.

Final Thought

Generative AI has changed the speed and scale of innovation, but not the fundamental laws of success.
Not every solution will be a triumph. Not every creation will matter. And that’s not a failure of AI — it’s a continuation of a timeless truth:
Pareto lives on.

The challenge now isn’t whether we can create solutions.
It’s whether we can find — and nurture — the ones that truly deserve to exist.

Broadway has always been more than just the bright lights and glittering marquees of New York City — it is a mirror reflecting not just cultural tastes, but also the broader economic environment. The question is: can Broadway visitor counts actually be used as an indicator of the economy’s health?

The answer, it turns out, is yes — but with some important nuances.

Broadway as an Economic Barometer

When the economy is booming, people have more discretionary income. Luxuries like theater tickets, especially the often-expensive ones on Broadway, become more accessible. In times of prosperity, we see:

• Higher attendance numbers
• Longer runs for shows
• A proliferation of new productions
• Premium pricing for tickets

On the other hand, during economic downturns, entertainment — particularly live, expensive experiences — is often one of the first expenses people cut back on. The 2008 financial crisis, for instance, saw a dip in Broadway revenues and attendance despite a few blockbuster shows still drawing crowds.

Broadway visitor counts can therefore provide a real-time snapshot of consumer confidence and spending behavior, much like box office numbers in Hollywood or vacation travel metrics.

What the Numbers Tell Us

Broadway attendance is tracked carefully by organizations like The Broadway League. Analysts often observe:

• Visitor counts rise during periods of strong GDP growth.
• Visitor counts plateau or decline during recessions, high inflation, or widespread financial uncertainty.

For example:

• Post-9/11 (2001): Broadway saw an immediate, sharp drop in tourism and attendance, reflecting national fear and economic instability.
• Post-Great Recession (2010-2013): As the economy slowly healed, so did Broadway, with strong ticket sales for megahits like The Book of Mormon and Wicked.

More recently, post-COVID reopening numbers told a complex story: although there was pent-up demand for live experiences, inflation and lingering financial fears kept some visitors at bay, and only the top shows saw record-breaking numbers.

What Visitor Counts Alone Can Miss

While Broadway attendance can reflect economic trends, it’s not a perfect or isolated measure. Several factors can skew the numbers:

• Tourism dynamics: A surge in foreign visitors might boost Broadway even when domestic consumers are cautious.
• Cultural phenomena: A breakout hit (Hamilton, for instance) can defy general economic trends.
• Subsidized attendance: Corporate sponsors, school trips, and discounts might keep attendance up even during downturns.

Moreover, shifts in entertainment consumption — such as the rise of streaming, VR experiences, or alternative live entertainment options — can affect Broadway independently of economic health.

Conclusion: A Useful, but Imperfect Indicator

Broadway visitor counts are like a thermometer — they can tell you something about the temperature of the economy, but they aren’t the full weather report. They are most powerful when analyzed alongside other metrics like consumer confidence indices, travel and hospitality trends, and disposable income statistics.

In short:
If Broadway is packed, it’s a good sign people feel financially comfortable.
If Broadway seats are empty, it might be time to check the economic forecast.

We’ve all said it to ourselves at some point:

“I’m not qualified for this.”
“I’m not experienced enough.”
“I don’t belong here.”

And sure, sometimes humility is necessary—especially if you’re trying to perform heart surgery or design a suspension bridge. In those cases, credentials matter. But for everything else?

It’s time to stop letting that inner voice disqualify you.

Growth Doesn’t Happen in Your Comfort Zone

Think back to the moments where you truly leveled up—were you ready? Probably not. Most meaningful growth begins with the moment you step into something you’ve never done before. You feel unqualified because you are. That’s the point.

Doing something you’ve never done before is how you gain experience. Waiting until you feel “ready” often means you’ll never start.

The Myth of “Being Ready”

We often imagine there’s a magical moment when we’ll be fully prepared: all the credentials checked, confidence brimming, imposter syndrome gone. That moment rarely, if ever, arrives.

The truth? Most people you admire also started before they were “ready.” They said yes to opportunities before they felt 100% confident. They didn’t fake it; they grew into it.

Qualification is Not Binary

We treat qualification as a gate: either you’re in or out. But reality is far more fluid. You don’t need to have done 100% of the job before to add value. In fact, being new can give you perspective others don’t have. You ask different questions. You challenge assumptions. You bring fresh eyes.

Just because you haven’t done it yet doesn’t mean you can’t.

As Long As You’re Not Performing Surgery…

Yes—some fields require strict training and credentials. If you’re flying planes, treating patients, or building skyscrapers, this message is not a permission slip to skip the training.

But most of us aren’t dealing with literal life-or-death scenarios. We’re writing code, managing teams, launching products, starting businesses, building communities. The stakes are real—but not fatal.

In those cases? Jump in. Learn fast. Ask for help. Take notes. And then do it again.

Action Builds Confidence

Confidence is a trailing indicator. It shows up after you’ve done the hard thing, not before. You don’t become confident to act—you act, and confidence follows.

That means the next time an opportunity comes up and your inner critic starts whispering “you’re not ready,” recognize that as the starting gun.

Not the stop sign.

TL;DR:

Stop telling yourself you’re not qualified. Growth begins where your qualifications end. The discomfort is not a signal to stop—it’s the signal you’re in the right place.

(Just don’t try to perform brain surgery or build a bridge unless you’ve actually studied for it.)

We live in a world that loves hustle. We’re surrounded by highlight reels, productivity hacks, motivational quotes, and a subtle (sometimes not-so-subtle) pressure to always be “on.” But here’s the truth that often gets lost in the noise: no one can be 100% every day — and that’s okay.

The Myth of Constant Peak Performance

Somewhere along the way, we began to associate consistency with perfection. That if you’re not giving everything you’ve got, every single day, you’re falling behind. But let’s take a breath and acknowledge something human: life isn’t linear.

There are days we wake up energized, creative, and in the flow. And there are days when just showing up is the win. You might not always be firing on all cylinders — and that doesn’t make you lazy, unmotivated, or broken. It makes you human.

Even elite athletes take rest days. Even high-performing teams rotate responsibilities. Even machines need maintenance. So why do we expect ourselves to operate at full capacity without pause?

Showing Up Looks Different Every Day

Your best today might look different from your best yesterday — and it should. Some days your “100%” is delivering a keynote. Other days, it’s replying to one email and taking a walk. Productivity is not always loud. Sometimes it whispers in rest, reflection, or simply surviving.

Give yourself permission to redefine success on a daily basis. Sometimes “doing your best” is not pushing through the wall, but recognizing it and honoring your limits.

Progress, Not Perfection

We’re not meant to be perfect — we’re meant to grow. And growth includes stumbles, pauses, and pivots. What matters more than being at 100% every day is being present, and being real.

If you’re in a season where everything feels heavier — that’s okay. If you’re moving a little slower — that’s okay. Healing, creating, building, learning, and even grieving — none of these follow a perfect schedule.

Let’s Normalize Being Human

Let’s normalize saying, “I’m not at my best today,” and not attaching guilt to it. Let’s create workspaces, friendships, and communities where it’s safe to have off days. Where rest isn’t a reward, but a right. Where recovery is seen as strength, not weakness.

We’re all doing the best we can with what we’ve got — and some days, that looks like 70%. Some days it looks like 40%. Some days it’s just showing up, and that’s more than enough.

Final Thought

You don’t have to be everything, all the time, to be worthy of grace, growth, or success. You’re allowed to have days when you’re not okay. You’re allowed to take the cape off. Because behind all the doing, there’s a being — and that being is enough.

Every spring, the Jewish holiday of Passover commemorates a story of liberation, resilience, and transformation. It’s more than a tale of freedom from physical slavery—it’s a timeless guide on how to lead through complexity, pivot through uncertainty, and build a culture of purpose. Surprisingly, many of its lessons map directly onto the world of Information Technology. In an industry constantly navigating legacy systems, migrations, and the unknown, the Passover story reads like a metaphor-rich playbook for IT leaders and teams.

1. Legacy Systems = Egypt

The Israelites were stuck in Egypt, trapped by a system they didn’t control and one that no longer served their future. Sound familiar? Many IT departments today are enslaved to legacy systems—outdated architectures, monolithic codebases, and inflexible processes that hinder innovation.

Passover Lesson: You must be willing to leave “Egypt” before you can transform. Breaking free of legacy isn’t just about tools—it’s about mindset, courage, and leadership.

2. The Plagues = Wake-Up Calls

The ten plagues weren’t random. Each was a disruption, a pattern-breaker, showing Egypt (and the Israelites) that the status quo couldn’t continue. In IT, our “plagues” might be security breaches, system outages, tech debt accumulation, or failed audits. Painful, yes—but often necessary catalysts for change.

Passover Lesson: Sometimes disruption is the only way to provoke transformation.

3. The Cloud = The Promised Land

The Israelites had to walk through the wilderness to reach a land flowing with milk and honey. In IT, that wilderness is often the painful in-between of cloud migration, digital transformation, or adopting DevOps and agile practices. It’s hard, slow, and full of unknowns.

Passover Lesson: The path to innovation requires patience, trust, and adaptability.

4. The Seder = Ritualized Learning and Documentation

Each year, families retell the Passover story in a structured, interactive meal called the Seder. It’s not just tradition—it’s knowledge transfer. In IT, we often forget to ritualize learning. Retrospectives get skipped. Documentation goes stale. Institutional memory is lost.

Passover Lesson: Narratives and rituals reinforce knowledge across generations. Build a culture where learnings are told, retold, and shared regularly.

5. The Haggadah = Clear Communication

The Haggadah guides participants through the Seder, ensuring everyone—young or old, tech-savvy or not—can follow the story. In IT, this is the equivalent of clear documentation, onboarding processes, or README files that even a new hire can understand.

Passover Lesson: If it’s not clear and inclusive, it won’t scale.

6. The Four Children = Understanding Stakeholders

In the Haggadah, there are four children: wise, wicked, simple, and one who does not know how to ask. Each asks a different question about Passover, and each receives a tailored answer. In IT, we engage with stakeholders who have different needs, levels of understanding, and concerns.

Passover Lesson: Know your audience. One-size-fits-all communication doesn’t work.

7. Matzah = Simplicity Under Pressure

Matzah is unleavened bread, baked quickly when there wasn’t time to let it rise. In IT, speed often requires simplicity. Whether shipping an MVP or rolling out a patch, sometimes delivering fast means trimming the fat.

Passover Lesson: When time is short, simplicity wins. Focus on essentials.

Conclusion:

Passover is ultimately a story of transformation: from bondage to freedom, from chaos to structure, from wandering to purpose. For IT leaders and technologists, it’s a powerful reminder that real change takes courage, intention, and collective memory.

As we retell the Passover story, let’s also reflect on our IT journeys. What “Egypt” do we need to leave behind? What plagues are trying to get our attention? And most importantly, what “Promised Land” are we leading our teams toward?

Because liberation in tech, like in life, is rarely about the tools—it’s about the people, the mindset, and the journey.

Chag sameach—and happy innovating.

In a world where innovation is celebrated as the holy grail of progress, it’s easy to fall into the trap of building for the sake of novelty. New technologies. New frameworks. New features. We chase what’s next—sometimes forgetting to ask whether it actually matters.

Innovation is thrilling. It’s the rush of exploring the unknown, of disrupting the status quo. But without impact, innovation is just noise. Flashy demos that never get adopted. Apps that win hackathons but never reach users. Features that solve no one’s problem.

The True North: Solving Real Problems

The most valuable innovations are the ones that solve real, painful, human problems. Think of the difference between inventing a smart mirror and creating a low-cost water filter for rural communities. Both are clever. Only one is life-changing.

When you start with impact as your goal, your innovation becomes a tool, not an idol. You move from “What can we build?” to “What do people need?” You prioritize listening over showcasing. Empathy over ego.

Innovation Without Direction is a Distraction

We’ve all seen it—teams stuck in endless cycles of prototyping, adding new features, or adopting the latest AI trend because it’s fashionable. The result? Complexity, not clarity. Motion, not progress.

Instead, align every innovation effort with a purpose. Ask:

• Who will this help?
• How will it change their experience?
• What does success look like—not for us, but for them?

Impact Brings Meaning—and Momentum

When your work makes a difference, you don’t need external motivation. The gratitude of a customer. The transformation of a process. The relief in someone’s eyes. That’s the kind of feedback loop that fuels teams for the long haul.

Innovation might win you applause. Impact earns you trust.

How to Shift from Innovation-First to Impact-First

1. Measure outcomes, not output. Track how lives are improved, not how many lines of code were written or patents were filed.
2. Listen before you build. Deep user research often reveals that what people actually need is far simpler (and more powerful) than what you assumed.
3. Prototype with purpose. Test ideas in the real world. Iterate based on feedback, not fantasy.
4. Celebrate meaningful progress. Highlight the customer stories, not just the tech specs.

The Best Innovations Disappear

The ultimate irony? When innovation is truly impactful, it often becomes invisible. It blends into life so seamlessly that no one thinks of it as innovation anymore. It just becomes the way things are done.

So as you dream big, code hard, and explore what’s possible—remember to ask one question again and again:

Is this making a difference?

Because at the end of the day, the world doesn’t need more innovation.

It needs more impact.

Butter churning may evoke pastoral images of wooden barrels and long days on the farm, but the process has been completely transformed by modern technologies. Today, AI, Blockchain, and IoT are not just buzzwords — they’re part of the new cream-to-butter pipeline that brings transparency, efficiency, and flavor optimization to one of the oldest dairy processes in the world.

Let’s churn through how each of these technologies is reshaping the butter industry.

🧠 AI in Butter Churning: From Gut Feeling to Data-Driven Flavor

Butter isn’t just fat and water — it’s chemistry, texture, and taste. AI helps modern churners perfect that balance.

1. Predictive Churning Models:
   AI models now predict optimal churning times and temperatures based on cream quality, fat content, and ambient humidity. Machine learning algorithms trained on historical data can fine-tune batch production in real time.
2. Flavor Profiling and Customization:
   Using AI-powered sensory analysis, producers can now offer flavor-customized butter (e.g., tangier cultured butter or smoother European-style) based on consumer preference analytics scraped from social media and e-commerce platforms.
3. Waste Reduction:
   AI detects anomalies in cream batches early in the process, preventing waste and increasing yield efficiency. It’s like having a virtual butter whisperer on staff.

🌐 IoT: The Smart Creamery

In a modern creamery, sensors talk to machines, machines talk to cloud systems, and butter practically churns itself.

1. Smart Sensors in Churns:
   IoT devices measure cream viscosity, temperature, and microbial activity in real time, automatically adjusting churning speed and duration.
2. Cold Chain Monitoring:
   Butter is sensitive to temperature. IoT thermometers throughout the supply chain ensure butter remains within its optimal range, sending alerts if conditions deviate.
3. Remote Operations:
   Churners no longer need to be present. An entire butter-making facility can be monitored — and even controlled — from a phone.

🔗 Blockchain: Butter Provenance and Trust

The butter on your toast might have a story, and blockchain helps tell it — verifiably.

1. Transparent Supply Chains:
   From cow to cream to churn to store, every step can be logged on a blockchain ledger. Consumers can scan a QR code and know the farm, the cow breed, even what feed was used.
2. Authenticity and Anti-Adulteration:
   Blockchain prevents fraud in premium butter markets, especially with products like organic, grass-fed, or artisanal butter. The immutable ledger ensures nothing has been tampered with post-production.
3. Smart Contracts for Dairy Co-ops:
   Blockchain-based contracts automatically ensure farmers are paid fairly based on cream fat content and volume delivered — no more disputes or delays.

🚀 Bonus: Butter-as-a-Service?

There’s even talk of Butter-as-a-Service (BaaS) platforms — subscription-based artisanal butter drops, with blockchain authentication, AI flavor customization, and IoT freshness tracking. It’s an Uber-for-butter world.

🧈 Final Spread

Modern butter churning is no longer about just shaking cream until it clumps. It’s a beautifully orchestrated dance of precision engineering, smart analytics, and transparent processes. With AI fine-tuning the recipe, IoT ensuring consistency, and blockchain securing trust — the humble butter churn has entered the 21st century with flair.

The only thing that hasn’t changed? The taste of good butter on warm toast. Some things, technology just makes better.

Thank you Rick McGuire and Matthew Calder for the second season of #MADI, the Microsoft Azure Developer Influencer program. Not only I learned tremendous and got influenced by it – but it gave me an option to influence Microsoft around Azure and more, and option to meet many like minded professionals. Looking forward to season 3! And it led to me becoming a Microsoft Most Valuable Professional as well – thank you for that help and the introduction to Betsy Weber and Rochelle Sonnenberg, both of whom I had the pleasure to meet at the #mvpsummit. #mvpbuzz!

The journey from Microsoft’s Semantic Kernel (SK) to Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers marks a significant evolution in how AI agents interface with external tools, services, and each other. This transformation illustrates a broader shift: from embedding intelligence into applications to building ecosystems where AI functions as an interoperable, real-time participant.

The Foundation: Semantic Kernel and AI Function Calling

Microsoft’s Semantic Kernel emerged as a pioneering framework enabling developers to integrate large language models (LLMs) with conventional application logic. With function calling, developers could expose native code (C#, Python, etc.) and prompt-based logic to LLMs, enabling them to take action based on user prompts or environmental context.

Semantic Kernel gave rise to hybrid agents—intelligent systems capable of reasoning with both data and action. A user could ask, “Book me a meeting with Lisa tomorrow at 3 PM,” and the LLM, using function calling, could interact with calendar APIs to complete the task. It was AI as orchestrator—not just respondent.

The Evolution: From Isolated Agents to Interconnected Systems

While Semantic Kernel empowered AI agents within a single application, the real world demanded interoperability. Different agents needed to interact—across organizations, services, and platforms. The limitation of isolated function calling soon became clear. A more extensible, secure, and discoverable way to publish and consume functions was needed.

Enter Model Context Protocol (MCP).

MCP: A Protocol for Open, Secure AI Interoperability

The Model Context Protocol, led by innovators including GitHub and backed by the OpenAI developer ecosystem, proposes a standardized way for LLMs to discover and invoke capabilities hosted anywhere—be it on a local server, enterprise API, or public service.

Think of MCP servers as the modern equivalent of “function registries.” They allow:

• Agents to query and discover available capabilities via a standard format.
• Functions to describe themselves semantically, including auth, input/output schemas, and constraints.
• A secure handshake and invocation pipeline, so one agent’s toolset can be safely used by another.

It’s the infrastructure needed to move from a single LLM agent to a network of agents working together across domains.

Why MCP Matters: An Open API for AI

Just as REST and GraphQL helped web services flourish, MCP may be the bridge that lets AI truly plug into the digital ecosystem:

• Modular AI Development: Build once, publish anywhere. Tools built for one model can be reused by others.
• Zero Trust Ready: Security is embedded from the start, with scopes, tokens, and permission management.
• Cross-Model Collaboration: Models from different vendors can collaborate using a common protocol, enabling heterogeneous multi-agent systems.

Real-World Momentum

We’ve already seen examples like:

• Claude building structures in Minecraft via MCP servers.
• Plugins and Copilot extensions aligning with MCP specs to offer discoverable functionality.
• Pulses of new MCP servers listed in public directories, showing adoption is growing fast.

From Function Calls to AI Protocols: What’s Next?

The transition from Semantic Kernel’s tightly-coupled function calls to the loosely-coupled, protocol-driven world of MCP reflects the broader evolution in software design—from monoliths to microservices, and now from mono-agents to mesh-agents.

This shift unlocks powerful possibilities:

• Open marketplaces of AI services
• Composable, dynamic workflows across models
• Agentic systems that evolve by learning new functions over time

Conclusion

Semantic Kernel gave us the building blocks. MCP is giving us the roads, bridges, and traffic rules. Together, they set the stage for the next generation of intelligent systems—open, secure, and interoperable by design.

The future isn’t just AI-powered apps. It’s AI-powered networks—and MCP is the protocol that could make them real.

In 2020, the world ground to a halt. COVID-19 locked us inside our homes, our cities, and in many ways, our minds. We adapted, but not without consequence. “Pandemic stiffness” became a real thing—both physical and psychological. Now, five years later, a new kind of stiffness is creeping in: AI stiffness.

Just as we once grew hesitant to move through the world freely, many are now becoming hesitant to think freely. The rise of AI-generated everything—texts, music, code, art—is creating an over-reliance that threatens our most human trait: creativity.

What Is AI Stiffness?

AI stiffness is the intellectual equivalent of sitting in one position too long. It’s the cognitive atrophy that happens when we no longer stretch our imagination because AI is doing the heavy lifting. It’s not that AI is inherently bad. Like any tool, it reflects how we use it. But when we reach for ChatGPT before trying to brainstorm, or let generative tools finish our ideas before we’ve even fully formed them, we start to lose creative muscle.

It’s easier, yes. But it’s also lazier.

The Similarity to COVID Stiffness

Think back to lockdowns. People developed aches from sitting too long. We got comfortable in discomfort. Movement felt risky. Many needed physical therapy just to feel normal again.

The same is happening intellectually. In a world flooded with AI-generated content, we’re becoming consumers of ideas rather than creators. Creativity is getting locked down—not by a virus, but by convenience.

And just like with COVID, if we don’t intervene early, the rehabilitation will take time.

The Consequence: Creativity Decay

Here’s what we risk losing:

• Originality – When everything starts from a template or a prompt, what happens to the messy brilliance of starting from scratch?
• Critical Thinking – If we let AI finish our thoughts, we lose the ability to refine and challenge them.
• Problem Solving – Great innovation comes from constraints and failures, not from perfect autocomplete.
• Human Touch – AI can replicate, but it can’t feel. True creativity is more than pattern recognition; it’s emotional intelligence in action.

We’re becoming addicted to optimization and allergic to exploration.

Reclaiming Creative Freedom

The solution isn’t to reject AI—it’s to reframe our relationship with it.

• Use AI as a jumping-off point, not the destination.
• Build “no-AI zones” into your workflow where your mind does the work first.
• Engage in analog creation—write with pen and paper, sketch without tools, ideate in whiteboards instead of screens.
• Practice creative resilience—force yourself into discomfort regularly, just like exercise.

Just like we had to learn how to move again post-lockdown, we have to relearn how to think without assistance. Creativity isn’t dead—but it might be asleep under a weighted AI blanket.

The Final Thought

We lived through COVID stiffness by moving again—imperfectly, awkwardly, but persistently. Now we face AI stiffness. The stakes may be different, but the remedy is the same: intentional, creative movement.

If we don’t start stretching our minds, we’ll wake up one day with the same question we asked after the pandemic: What happened to us?

And maybe the scarier question: Can we get it back?